How Complexity Quietly Drains Team Momentum
by
David Edwards
November 16, 2025


by
David Edwards
Katie Parrott is a staff writer and AI editorial lead at Every. She writes Working Overtime, a column about how technology reshapes work, and builds AI-powered systems for the Every editorial team.
Last updated:
November 16, 2025
Most leaders look for dramatic causes when performance declines. They assume the problem is insufficient skill, unclear strategy, or individual accountability. But in many cases, the real issue is far less visible: accumulated operational complexity.
Complexity rarely announces itself. It begins with small adjustments—an added step in a process, an extra layer of communication, a new tool meant to solve a local problem. Over time, these additions compound. A process that once took two steps now takes five. A decision that used to involve one team now involves three. The organization becomes heavier without realizing it.
A logistics company we supported believed their execution challenges were tied to seasonal volume. But when we mapped their workflows, a more accurate picture emerged. The business was not suffering from excessive demand—it was suffering from operational complexity. Processes were duplicated, responsibilities were blurred, and information was scattered across multiple systems.
This pattern is common. Complexity grows gradually until it becomes the hidden tax on every initiative.
Key takeaways
Complexity creeps in silently—until it becomes chaos.
Momentum isn’t lost through major failures but small, repeated friction.
As complexity grows, decision and communication pathways slow.
Reducing complexity increases capacity without adding headcount.
To address the issue, we began by tracing a single customer order through the organization. The journey revealed multiple handoffs, inconsistent communication loops, and unclear ownership. Many steps existed not because they were necessary, but because they had been added over time to compensate for previous breakdowns.
We then conducted a complexity audit, identifying redundant processes, unnecessary work, and unclear interfaces between teams. The goal was not to reduce effort but to simplify the system.
The changes were straightforward:
Removing duplicated work
Codifying workflows
Eliminating steps that no longer served a purpose
Clarifying ownership where ambiguity had grown
Improving visibility across the process
Once complexity was reduced, execution became noticeably smoother. Teams reported feeling less overwhelmed, communication loops shortened, and capacity increased—without hiring additional staff.
Momentum does not disappear spontaneously. It is eroded by friction, slowdowns, and accumulated inefficiencies. Leaders who consistently simplify their operating systems protect their organization’s ability to move quickly and confidently.
Complexity is unavoidable.
Unmanaged complexity is not.
Most leaders look for dramatic causes when performance declines. They assume the problem is insufficient skill, unclear strategy, or individual accountability. But in many cases, the real issue is far less visible: accumulated operational complexity.
Complexity rarely announces itself. It begins with small adjustments—an added step in a process, an extra layer of communication, a new tool meant to solve a local problem. Over time, these additions compound. A process that once took two steps now takes five. A decision that used to involve one team now involves three. The organization becomes heavier without realizing it.
A logistics company we supported believed their execution challenges were tied to seasonal volume. But when we mapped their workflows, a more accurate picture emerged. The business was not suffering from excessive demand—it was suffering from operational complexity. Processes were duplicated, responsibilities were blurred, and information was scattered across multiple systems.
This pattern is common. Complexity grows gradually until it becomes the hidden tax on every initiative.
Key takeaways
Complexity creeps in silently—until it becomes chaos.
Momentum isn’t lost through major failures but small, repeated friction.
As complexity grows, decision and communication pathways slow.
Reducing complexity increases capacity without adding headcount.
To address the issue, we began by tracing a single customer order through the organization. The journey revealed multiple handoffs, inconsistent communication loops, and unclear ownership. Many steps existed not because they were necessary, but because they had been added over time to compensate for previous breakdowns.
We then conducted a complexity audit, identifying redundant processes, unnecessary work, and unclear interfaces between teams. The goal was not to reduce effort but to simplify the system.
The changes were straightforward:
Removing duplicated work
Codifying workflows
Eliminating steps that no longer served a purpose
Clarifying ownership where ambiguity had grown
Improving visibility across the process
Once complexity was reduced, execution became noticeably smoother. Teams reported feeling less overwhelmed, communication loops shortened, and capacity increased—without hiring additional staff.
Momentum does not disappear spontaneously. It is eroded by friction, slowdowns, and accumulated inefficiencies. Leaders who consistently simplify their operating systems protect their organization’s ability to move quickly and confidently.
Complexity is unavoidable.
Unmanaged complexity is not.
Insights
Read more articles
Questions & answers
Frequently
Asked Questions
How do I know which service is the best fit for my situation?
We start every engagement with a short consultation to understand your current challenges, goals, and operational landscape. Based on that context, we recommend the service that provides the highest leverage—whether that's a one-time strategic engagement, operational support, or ongoing advisory. Our goal is to match you with the approach that creates the most clarity and impact, not to oversell unnecessary work.
What does the typical engagement timeline look like?
Do you work with companies of all sizes or only established teams?
What level of involvement is required from our leadership team?
How do you measure the success of an engagement?
How do I know which service is the best fit for my situation?
We start every engagement with a short consultation to understand your current challenges, goals, and operational landscape. Based on that context, we recommend the service that provides the highest leverage—whether that's a one-time strategic engagement, operational support, or ongoing advisory. Our goal is to match you with the approach that creates the most clarity and impact, not to oversell unnecessary work.
What does the typical engagement timeline look like?
Do you work with companies of all sizes or only established teams?
What level of involvement is required from our leadership team?
How do you measure the success of an engagement?
How do I know which service is the best fit for my situation?
We start every engagement with a short consultation to understand your current challenges, goals, and operational landscape. Based on that context, we recommend the service that provides the highest leverage—whether that's a one-time strategic engagement, operational support, or ongoing advisory. Our goal is to match you with the approach that creates the most clarity and impact, not to oversell unnecessary work.



